In conclusion the author of “The Forest of Gods” is both “a native” (a prisoner of the concentration camp experiencing all the hardships) and “an anthropologist” (who acts as an outside observer, a curious collector of information). “The Forest of Gods” is compared to ethnographic texts written in a thick description manner. Sruoga is introduced as a distinctive anthropologically-oriented observer who is “involved” in a forced procedure of participant observation. ![]() Afterwards, focus is made on some general methodological principles of socio-cultural anthropology revealed in Clifford Geertz’s, James Clifford’s, Harvey Russell Bernard’s, Vytis Čiubrinskas’s and other anthropologists’ works that are applicable for analysis of “The Forest of Gods” by Balys Sruoga.įurthermore, the article analyses “The Forest of Gods” by Balys Sruoga as a non-ordinary, specificanthropological study. ![]() The beginning of the article shortly overlooks the diversity of literary and anthropological relations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |